Showing posts with label Valery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Valery. Show all posts

2.22.2020

on your dark retina




SEA-FROTH

The soft touch of watercolor
like a moist afterthought
on your dark retina.
The comeliness of ballet dancer

uprightness of innocent angel
her glance prematurely sad
– unfolding her fan of mustard
gold (butterfly wings on purple balsa)

beneath rough branches of jack pine
& beside the air conditioner,
a sunless window (in its lunar
TV efflorescence).  With her fine

naiad brow, brimming with thought
& the dignity of her wings
like a daughter of Memphis king
or mother… Isis or Hathor (Thoth

merging with dappled river pattern
yet again).  & in upper
right-hand corner a minor
violet cloud, a miniature icon –

Notre Dame (unburnt as yet?) – or
Statue of Liberty?  Unclear,
inchoate… like right now, here
in this charcoal-smoky, somewhere-

possible America – suffering glare
of phosphor-bomb campaigns
& camouflage engines –
blind canvas (some cimetière

                  *

marin) of noon.  & as the sun descends
west of the granite capital
& you sense (as the ineffable
arc of those feathers, wafting, bends

to rose Pacific horizon) the limpid
gloom of freedom’s evening
then she will be gathering
fragment-limbs of her beloved…

Isis, young dark dancer by the Nile.
Shades of live oaks,
holm oaks, holly oaks…
green Acorn Kings of Hollywood… will

stay awhile.  The restoration of the earth
will be a Morris dance –
as (in his happy trance)
the young king will relight the hearth

under the aegis of that Providence
kind Williams’ hand held forth
over the sea-froth
chasm of an Ocean State (whence

every liberty proceeds).  I mean
the heart’s imagination
of dove-divination,
when prancing St. Jeanne rose again

from dusty repetition of revenge
into a coracle of Union
her canoe of sun-flotation,
Hobo’s freeway cloverleaf (Stonehenge).

2.21.20

3.24.2005

Reading Maurice Blanchot on Mallarme, courtesy of Jonathan.

Distinction he makes between Valery & Mallarme. For the former, poetry is a vehicle of meditation, intellectual mastery; for the latter, purely an aesthetic object formed from words (words from which everything has been refined away, except for this aesthetic essence).

An aesthetic based in turn on the one characteristic of language which fascinates Mallarme : the way in which words replace, disperse - distance themselves, abstract themselves - from the real things they sometimes represent. In so doing, words present themselves in aesthetic form - as poems.

Maybe my shadow-boxing with Language Poetry over the years has been, in part, a battle with my own fascination with, my own bent toward, some such seductive doctrine. Solipsism, solitude, silence, music.

How different the doctine of the Chicago critics (not great poets themselves, admittedly - but going back to Coleridge, for one, anyway...). Here the aesthetic imprint of a poem is not so simply yoked to the words, the language medium, per se.

Just as Mandelstam juxtaposed the Ukrainian philologist Potebnia (with his notion of the "inner psychic image" of the word) to the Russian formalists (with their poetics based on a linguistics which analyzed the word into separate functions) - the Chicago School opposed the strictly linguistic poetics of the New Critics, with a kind of metalinguistic concept of the poem. That is, the poem can't be reduced to its linguistic medium : rather, the medium conveys an imaginative whole, a complex image (a single lyric, or an entire play, or an epic).

Still, Mallarme (and lurking behind him, Poe & Baudelaire) accomplished something permanent (he discovered a sort of antimatter) : everything after has to take it into account. How that gets done, in theory & practice, is the big question. Celan maybe took it to the limit. Every word refers to some train of thought & feeling - conceptual, experiential, personal. Yet the words are so encrypted in their own musical silence as to both invite & defy "meaning", interpretation. The defiance itself is rendered as (tragic) beauty.

So Celan sort of has it both ways. His defiance of meaning is not a literary game or an ideological program. It stems from a felt awareness of death, wrong, grief, hope, love - which are, in a sense, extra-poetic "referents". Or they are elements from the realm of fact & "journalism" which are both acknowledged & somehow won for poetry, absorbed.

I'm sure all this sounds awfully obvious to those who've spent more time with these poets & these issues.

5.24.2003

Paul Valery : Imagine God, before Creation, turning to examine himself in the mirror (& adjusting his tie). Someone said, "God vacations in France." There you have him.