Serves me right - after my glib gab here yesterday about dreams, la vida es sueno, etc. - that last night I would wake up at 3 a.m. after a dark & troubling dream that stirred my conscience. Jealousy, violence, remorse... strange symbolism of the heart.
"The heart is desperately corrupt"... says the prophet Jeremiah.
Lay awake thinking about the dream for a long time.
My comments in yesterday's post about holism in literature, philosophy, theology - and about the Union, and the common good, sought through the civic faith of Gorski's "American covenant" - were undercut a little by my own dream last night. I lay there pondering things about which perhaps the Puritans and Roger Williams also meditated late at night.
The separation of Church & State, or Williams' (& others') distinction between the "two tables" of the Mosaic law (the sacred and the civil codes) perhaps grows logically out of a real, a factual, distinction, between a person's spiritual life - the life of the soul - and the collective social life we organize and share. Between religion & government; between spirit & flesh. Perhaps there is this deep and actual dividing line - in the midst of all the seamlessness of vision, the oneness of nature, and the unity of the common good toward which we strive together.
For me the problematics and contradictions of this situation are almost irresolvable and impossible to figure out. Because, as the animale compagnevole, we obviously do not live our lives alone; we are born into relations with others; our very selves develop in these deep relationships. Yet many (including Roger Williams, for example) would argue that true religion is about the individual soul's relationship with God.
Perhaps one solution is to suggest that the solitude of our relation to God is also the pivot of our personal liberty, and the foundation of our moral responsibility (freedom and responsibility being the very spine of personal selfhood).
We can understand, in this context, how the absolute transcendence of the Hebrew God stands as the basis, the historical origin, of moral freedom and human equality. Not that moral freedom and equality did not previously exist in various kinship bands and human cultures beforehand; but the Hebraic covenant so to speak articulated this reality in stone, in the midst of empires and states devoted to sacred kings and unlimited, divine royal power.
But let me return to last night's dream. The heart is desperately corrupt, the prophet cries. Between the mind's dutiful bookkeeping and the heart's passions lies a wide dark gulf. I woke from my disturbing dream with this thought : true religion is the soul's remorseful conscience, seeking the intercession of the Spirit, the mercy of God, because there is no other help. John the Baptist at the river's edge, for example, demanding only personal simplicity and true repentance. The universal "high priest" is essentially a healer of souls.
This spiritual dimension is personal. It is an otherness, distinct from the public, civic, political sphere. The two dimensions are obviously intertwined in each of our lives, and in all our cultures, societies, nations - yet they are distinct. The two tables of the Law. "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's". Roger Williams, among others, believed in "natural law" - that human beings are naturally endowed with the conscience to determine right and wrong, and the ability to organize themselves in societies dedicated (however imperfectly) to liberty and justice. The fact that people of all faiths and cultures are so endowed, whatever their denomination or confession, is the prime basis for religious liberty and political tolerance.
I don't know if I've been able to express myself very clearly or well here this morning. What struck me as I lay there thinking over the dream was a sense of contrast between our public and politically-charged debates about cultural and religious issues, our disputes over differing group demands, rights, and powers, one the one hand - and the inward spiritual dimension of "true religion" on the other. Conscience, belief, reasoning, searching hearts, inwardness, and personal acts of repentance, humility and charity : these are religion. "Do justice, and walk humbly with your God". It's not about political maneuvering, bickering, and social power. Those things are part of the civic world, the secular table of the Law.
Showing posts with label dreams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dreams. Show all posts
8.11.2020
9.02.2018
Beulah is 90
BEULAH
for MRG
Beulah fell asleep this afternoon
in her sidewalk chair. Phosphor clouds
spun tacked-up overhead – caravels
unknotting archipelagoes of dreams.
Beulah is ninety. All she’s done
was finished years ago – love, kids,
work... making, helping. Now the swells
of receding seasons wester into beams
of sundown. The scramble to survive,
the ferris wheels of sex and politics,
her wrestlings with faith and doubt
are folded into one frail dormant hive
of arms, face, breast. Fleet prolix
dreams fuse with the Dreaming she’s about.
Labels:
Beulah,
Dreaming,
dreams,
Mary R. Gould
12.20.2007
Had one of those unusual "in dreams begin responsibilities" dreams last night. One of those out-of-left-field dreams, that has you lying there thinking at 3 AM.
Was encountering, and reading poems by, a poet, say in her late 30s or 40s, who was living with her young daughter in a cheap, discount basement apt., someplace up north, like Canada. She was charming, winsome, reddish blonde... the daughter was like a little sprite, an Ariel - kind of moody - she had a special flying car or sled which she would lodge in a hollow tree trunk, her hideout... it had a great name (the sled) which of course I can't remember... (not Rosebud, anyway...)
It was clear that the poet was bohemian, poor, living only for her poetry, a dreamer... her poetry was about her daily life with poetry... sort of a Mandelshtamian "blessed poverty", allowing her to live in & for her imagination alone... the daughter a kind of quintessence of that life... I was reading some of the poems, but can't remember much about them (except that she used the occasional ampersand (&)).
What struck me was the clarity and force of this impression of impractical dedication, the brave "negative capability" she was manifesting, and the vibrant, verdant, vernal feeling of joy - I have a clear image of her smiling sideways glance, and the forest greenery around her daughter's sled hideout - which seemed to emanate from the dream as a whole, & stayed with me after I woke up...
Bachelard or Jung would call this some kind of "anima" dream, I reckon. It was a poetry dream, a dream from poetry.
Was encountering, and reading poems by, a poet, say in her late 30s or 40s, who was living with her young daughter in a cheap, discount basement apt., someplace up north, like Canada. She was charming, winsome, reddish blonde... the daughter was like a little sprite, an Ariel - kind of moody - she had a special flying car or sled which she would lodge in a hollow tree trunk, her hideout... it had a great name (the sled) which of course I can't remember... (not Rosebud, anyway...)
It was clear that the poet was bohemian, poor, living only for her poetry, a dreamer... her poetry was about her daily life with poetry... sort of a Mandelshtamian "blessed poverty", allowing her to live in & for her imagination alone... the daughter a kind of quintessence of that life... I was reading some of the poems, but can't remember much about them (except that she used the occasional ampersand (&)).
What struck me was the clarity and force of this impression of impractical dedication, the brave "negative capability" she was manifesting, and the vibrant, verdant, vernal feeling of joy - I have a clear image of her smiling sideways glance, and the forest greenery around her daughter's sled hideout - which seemed to emanate from the dream as a whole, & stayed with me after I woke up...
Bachelard or Jung would call this some kind of "anima" dream, I reckon. It was a poetry dream, a dream from poetry.
Labels:
dreams,
imagination,
poetry2
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
