Quick reply, Susan : my sense is that Pound, despite all his Dantesque and Provencal medievalism, his knowledge of medieval scholastic theology, tends to deride and downplay the "Hebraic" dimension of Western culture-history. There is a strong occultist dimension - the Eleusinian mysteries, Neo-platonism, etc. Also the very marked Fascist tendencies, the Nietzschean(?) disdain for Jewish and Christian compassion. Pound is not consistent : my "argument" with him is not very fair. But it's there. Pound's "poem including history", in my view, pretty much eviscerates the basic Jewish-Christian foundations of (at least) the Western dimensions of world history.
Another aspect of all this concerns Crane. Pound (like Eliot in some ways) was a nostalgic expatriate living in Europe. He was a political authoritarian, a reactionary. Hart Crane, despite his Platonic-visionary leanings, was devoted to Whitman and the tradition of a mythical, futuristic America (Crane's "Atlantis"), rooted in democratic values. This is, I know, a great simplification and idealization of Crane. Crane has a special symbolic place in Ravenna Diagram and in my writing in general, which I won't get into now. But the STYLE of R.D. owes at least as much to Crane as to Pound. For I long time I sensed a kind of sonic stylistic affinity between Crane's idiom (his imagery and sound) and Mandelstam's approach to imagery, metaphor & sound. Which (sort of) became my own approach to imagery & sound.
No comments:
Post a Comment